Ottawa doesn't need more
roads
Barry Wellar
Ottawa Citizen, June 23, 2005
The campaign to expand the Queensway across Ottawa points to a bizarre
obsession with road building in the Ontario Ministry of Transportation
and the City of Ottawa.
During the past 10 years,
segments and intersections of numerous arterial roads, as well as the
Queensway itself, were expanded to solve the efficiency and congestion
objectives listed in the Queensway "study" notices circulated
by the ministry in partnership with the city. Incredibly, those expansions
followed similar expansions extending back at least 30 years, and additional
network expansions are already under consideration for the next 10 years!
Some critics call urban road
expansion projects in 2005 exercises in futility, signs of incompetence
and admissions of ignorance about alternative transportation options.
Others are more cynical, saying they are a way of rewarding major contributors
to election campaigns.
Communications with the ministry
of transportation indicate that, while those perceptions may be valid,
they only scratch the surface when it comes to diagnosing the "pave-it
behaviour" of the ministry and the city. These are letters sent
over the past year to Transportation Minister Harinder Takhar and Ottawa
West-Nepean MPP Jim Watson, and copied to municipal politicians. The
ministry was asked to produce two specific bodies of empirical evidence
to demonstrate how its road network expansion projects would actually
contribute to the sustainable development promises contained in provincial
policies, plans and programs, and the campaign pledges in the Liberals'
"Building Strong Communities."
Specifically, the MTO was
asked to "... identify 35 or so metropolitan regions in North America
for which it has been conclusively proven that the promises contained
in the MTO ad have been achieved by road widenings." It was also
asked to "... produce documentation to prove that the widenings
of major roads in those 35 or so metropolitan regions had none of the
negative consequences -- increased sprawl, increased pollution, increased
fossil fuel consumption, increased infrastructure costs, etc. -- that
many researchers argue are causally related to major road expansion
programs in metropolitan areas in Canada and the U.S."
If that comparative evidence
were produced, there would be no need for more studies and the ministry
could proceed with the expansion.
The ministry replied that
it had no evidence of any project -- not even one -- that satisfied
the two conditions. It also acknowledged that it was not aware of the
outcomes of any of the thousands of road-widening projects undertaken
in metropolitan regions outside Ontario.
Questions were also raised
about whether the Ontario government applies a sustainable transportation
test to its projects. Inquiries sent to Mr. Takhar, Mr. Watson, MTO
staff, and Environment Commissioner Gord Miller, as well as numerous
searches of Ontario government websites, failed to yield any evidence
that such a test is used by the ministry of transportation.
Analysis of the replies from government officials indicated that no
one had any idea how to design such a test, much less apply it in evaluating
a proposed road expansion project.
Accepting, therefore, that
the ministry has no sustainability test -- and no idea how to design
or use one -- it is hard to see any purpose in holding public meetings
which, of necessity, must deal with sustainability issues. These meetings
are held to satisfy a legal requirement, and let people feel they are
being heard, but from a substantive point of view, they are a sham.
Two defining features of the transportation ministry -- a total unwillingness
to take into account what has happened elsewhere, and the absence of
a sustainability test to evaluate proposed widenings -- point to an
inescapable diagnosis: The only reason the ministry expands roads is
because that's the only thing it can think of.
As for the City of Ottawa,
it seems to be mesmerized by the transportation ministry and rarely
has an independent thought when road widenings are proposed.
The MOT has long been known
for its bizarre behaviour and should have been reformed years ago. Premier
Dalton McGuinty can kick-start the process by requiring the agency to
apply a rigorous sustainable transportation test to all projects. But
he needs to act before the Queensway widening is approved and Ottawa's
transportation problems reach an entirely new level of difficulty, cost,
and consequence.
Barry Wellar is a professor
in the geography department at the University of Ottawa.