Airport
Parkway Extended Traffic Impact Study (APETIS)
This page summarizes the portions
of the APETIS report most relevant to the Alta Vista Corridor EA.
The bottom line: the APETIS
report demonstrates that traffic modelling techniques which ignore induced
traffic effects significantly underestimate increases in traffic that
are the result of road expansion projects. In the Airport Parkway
case the morning rush hour forecast increase in sections of Bronson were
too low by as much as 51%. There has been no explanation other than induced
traffic for this huge error. The APETIS report also demonstrates that
you need to model both AM and PM rush hours.
Details:
Maxgroup Associates published
a report on the Airport Parkway Extended Traffic Impact Study (APETIS)
for the City of Ottawa in September 1999. That report documents the
traffic forecasts done to predict the impact of adding ramps to the
Airport Parkway at Hunt Club to allow commuters to use the Parkway to
get downtown and back. It also documents the actual traffic observed
after the ramps were added, which is what makes that report relatively
unique and valuable. Most road building projects consist of planning
the road, making forecasts and then building the road and that's all.
Double checking if the forecasts were right doesn't fall into the mandate
of most road building projects.
The APETIS report includes
traffic forecasts for the Airport Parkway/Bronson corridor. Forecasts
were done in both the morning and afternoon rush hours. Even though
the afternoon rush hour is the normally the busiest for the city's road
network as a whole, the morning rush hour was also studied in this case.
Traffic's behaviour is significantly different in the AM from the PM
in this case because the bottlenecks in the corridor are most pronounced
at the north end.
Summary of actual traffic
(number of cars) versus forecast taken from AM rush hour data from the
APETIS report:
Road
Segment |
From |
To |
Actual total in
1998
|
Forecast
total for 1999 |
Forecast
increase |
Actual
total in 1999 |
Actual
increase |
Error
in forecast increase |
Percent
error in forecast increase |
Airport Parkway |
Hunt Club |
Walkley |
980 |
1800 |
820 |
1600 |
620 |
-200 |
-32% |
Airport Parkway |
Walkley |
Brookfield |
910 |
1500 |
590 |
1550 |
640 |
50 |
8% |
Bronson |
Heron |
Sunnyside |
2300 |
2520 |
220 |
2710 |
410 |
190 |
46% |
Bronson |
Canal |
Carling |
1700 |
1920 |
220 |
2150 |
450 |
230 |
51% |
Bronson |
Carling |
Queensway |
1600 |
1820 |
220 |
1860 |
260 |
40 |
15% |
By the way, overall traffic
on other north-south arterials such as Bank and Main did not go down
as the traffic increased on the Airport Parkway/Bronson corridor. The
southern end of Bank saw a small reduction but northern end of Bank
along with Main saw increases as a result of cut-through traffic from
Bronson in the morning rush hour.
Implications for the Alta Vista
Corridor EA:
- The Alta Vista Corridor
just like the Airport Parkway/Bronson corridor has significant bottlenecks
at the northern end. Failure to model morning rush hour will hide significant
traffic issues. The consultant is currently proposing a 4-lane road
in the Alta Vista Corridor without planning to look at traffic in the
morning rush hour until after the the preferred solution is chosen.
As a result, the consultant's road evaluation is incomplete.
- The consultant proposing
a roadway for the Alta Vista Corridor is not taking into account the
possibility of induced traffic and ignoring previously observed errors.
This means the consultant's traffic forecasts underestimate traffic
overall in road expansion scenarios. Their claims of traffic levels
in the Alta Vista Corridor and on related arterials need to be adjusted
upwards along with air quality impacts (pollution and green house gases).
|